Competition economics

As the leading provider of competition economics services in Africa, Genesis Analytics has an unmatched breadth and depth of skills and experience. Blue-chip companies across Africa routinely rely on us for expert advice and support when they interact with competition authorities. We also work extensively with regulators and competition authorities, giving us a position of trust based on a strong reputation for providing robust and independent expert economic views.

Read More
Expertise Areas

Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

We offer expert economic analysis, advice and testimony in cases related to anti-competitive conduct. This includes investigations into cartel conduct, vertical agreements and abuse of dominance allegations such as excessive pricing, refusal to supply, exclusive supply and distribution arrangements, predatory pricing, bundling and tying, and price discrimination. We also provide advice in designing and responding to market inquiries in sectors such as banking, supermarkets and healthcare. Our regulatory accounting expertise is key for assessment of excessive pricing, predatory pricing and margin-squeeze cases, among others.

Merger analysis and public interest

We provide expert economic analysis, advice and testimony relating to mergers at the various stages of approval by competition authorities. This can be offered within the context of assisting with merger filings or in opposition to mergers. This economic analysis includes market definition as well as the assessment of the competitive effects, efficiencies and public interest effects associated with the transaction.  We routinely work with private companies (merging parties and interveners), the competition authorities as well as other parties such as government departments, statutory organisations and trade unions.

Expert testimony

The Genesis team has extensive experience in providing testimony as independent expert witnesses in hearings at the competition courts and tribunals that routinely stands up to scrutiny. Expert testimony is also provided in arbitration and High Court proceedings and regulation.

Compliance advice

We conduct confidential assessments of the compliance of business practices with competition legislation and the risks faced as a consequence of possible anti-competitive conduct. We also advise on the redesign of business practices that satisfies client business objectives while complying with competition law. Business practices typically examined here include pricing and rebate structures, exclusivity arrangements and information sharing between competitors (for example through industry associations).  We also routinely conduct market definition assessments for firms to assist in determining whether they would be likely to be subject to provisions of competition legislation applicable to dominant firms.

Projects

Genesis probes restrictive warranties on car parts

Project name:
Assessment of the impact that prescriptive warranty provisions by original equipment motor vehicle manufacturers have on South African consumers

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Manufacturing
Transport

Area of Expertise:
Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

Client:
Confidential

Date:
2015

Country:
South Africa


Genesis was asked by a player in the automotive industry to conduct an independent economic assessment of the impact of prescriptive warranty provisions used by original equipment motor vehicle manufacturers (OEMs) on South African consumers.  

Similar conduct by OEMs has not been treated favourably by competition authorities in other jurisdictions. In South Africa no remedial measures have been taken to address the possible restriction of competition in the aftermarkets for automotive spares and repair of motor vehicles. 

The purpose of the report was to highlight to the Competition Commission the significant positive impact that remedial intervention in motor vehicle aftermarkets could have in terms of competition and, hence, the cost of motor vehicle repairs in South Africa. 

Genesis outlined in its analysis why the imposition of restrictive warranty conditions by OEMs was likely to raise competition concerns.  These restrictive practices included the use of OEM branded parts and OEM approved service centres or panel beaters for vehicles under warranty. 

In particular, Genesis showed that due to the firm-specific nature of motor vehicle aftermarkets, OEMs are likely to possess market power in the aftermarket for their parts and repairs.  Genesis' analysis demonstrated that the benefits to consumers from enacting remedial measures to prohibit the use of such restrictions in motor vehicle warranties would likely run into the billions of rands.  

Subsequent to Genesis’ engagement with the commission, the commission announced in February 2017 that it would hold an industry workshop to discuss recommendations to remedy conduct that it had identified as creating competitive distortions in automotive aftermarkets. 

Commission probe might unlock savings for consumers

Genesis advises Media24 in seminal predatory pricing case

Project name:
Expert economic testimony in South Africa's seminal predatory pricing case

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Communications and media

Area of Expertise:
Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

Client:
Media24

Date:
2011 - present

Country:
South Africa


Genesis was retained by Media24, a large newspaper and magazine publisher, to defend predatory pricing allegations made against the group by the Competition Commission in what has proven to be South Africa’s seminal  predation case. 

Predatory pricing generally refers to a strategy whereby a company prices its products at a low level in the short term in order to exclude rivals from the market, and then raises its prices in the medium to long term in order to recoup profits. 

In South Africa, Section 8(d)(iv) of the Competition Act (No. 89 of 1998) explicitly outlaws predatory pricing. The Act also allows for claims of such conduct to be assessed using the general exclusionary clause outlined in Section 8(c). 

The commission was acting on a complaint lodged by Gold-Net News, a former community newspaper published in the Free State Goldfields  region. Gold-Net News alleged that Forum, one of Media24’s publications in that region, had been used as a “fighting brand” and its adverts priced below the production cost of the newspaper from 2004 to 2009 in order to exclude Gold-Net News from the market. 

On behalf of the complainant, the commission further alleged that, upon Gold-Net News’s exit from the market in 2009, the Forum title was withdrawn and its sister publication, Vista, was left to profit from its resulting market position. 

The firm’s involvement in this ongoing case has spanned the investigation phase; the complaint hearing before the Competition Tribunal, at which it was found that there was no evidence of Media24 pricing the publication below average or at marginal cost; and, most recently, the hearing on remedies following the tribunal’s decision that Media24 had contravened section 8(c) of the Act. 

It has encompassed detailed financial analysis of Media24’s management accounts in conjunction with careful analysis of the economic evidence. As the case has unfolded, the expert analysis undertaken by the Genesis team has traversed a number of important economic issues before the tribunal, which are likely to assist in bringing greater legal certainty in future cases.

As it stands, Media24 has appealed the Tribunal's Section 8(c) finding, and the appeal will be heard by the Competition Appeal Court in August 2017.

Expert analysis in Africa's largest bottling merger

Project name:
Project Savannah

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Manufacturing

Area of Expertise:
Merger analysis and public interest
Expert testimony

Client:
The Coca-Cola Company, SABMiller and Coca-Cola Sabco

Date:
2014 - 2016

Country:
Botswana
Kenya
Namibia
South Africa
Tanzania


Genesis Analytics was appointed jointly by The Coca-Cola Company, SABMiller and Coca-Cola Sabco to provide expert economic advice regarding the creation of Coca-Cola Beverages Africa, the largest Coca-Cola bottler on the African continent.

The transaction was investigated and approved by the competition authorities of Botswana, Kenya, Namibia, Tanzania, the Common Market for East and Southern Africa (COMESA) and, lastly, South Africa. 

Genesis met the many and varied challenges thrown up by this transaction, such as the fact that it involved some of the largest beverage and bottling firms across multiple jurisdictions and, more significantly, that it became a landmark public interest case in South Africa. Genesis is fast-becoming a leading provider of economic assessments of public interest concerns in merger control, with this transaction following its key contributions to the assessment of employment issues in the Walmart-Massmart merger, amongst others.

In this case, our work was a focal point in negotiations between the merging parties, the Minister of Economic Development and the Competition Commission over two conditions. 

The first related to employment, where Genesis provided analysis relating to the headcount condition and its appropriate duration. The employment condition approved by the Competition Tribunal is limited to three years. 

The second related to a requirement that the merged firm allow its competitors to access Coca-Cola-branded coolers. Our use of robust survey analysis provided a factual basis to determine the appropriate limits to this access conditions.  .

This condition was also approved by the Competition Tribunal.

In addition to addressing the various competition concerns raised by the authorities that investigated this transaction, our analysis of these public interest issues assisted in finalising a lengthy process with a positive outcome for all parties involved.

Expert analysis on impact of Walmart-Massmart merger

Project name:
Expert advice and testimony on public interest issues in the landmark Walmart merger before the competition authorities

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Retail
Manufacturing
Public and social

Area of Expertise:
Merger analysis and public interest
Expert testimony

Client:
South African Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers Union

Date:
2011-2012

Country:
South Africa


Genesis was appointed to provide expert analysis on Walmart’s proposed acquisition of Massmart by affected trade unions, which were later joined by the Department of Economic Development. This was considered a seminal case regarding public interest issues related to mergers and acquisitions in South Africa.

The central issues at stake were whether the acquisition would result in a loss of employment, or reduction in the conditions of employment, and an increase in global sourcing at the expense of domestic industry. Genesis was brought in to provide expert analysis of these issues by the trade unions, later joined by the Department of Economic Development. 

The particular challenge in this case was not only to determine if such effects were likely on the economic and documentary evidence, but also if likely, what the quantum of effect would be. Genesis was able to meet this challenge through the careful extraction of key information from the vast discovery and the application of a variety of economic tools drawn from international trade theory, labour economics and input-output analysis. 

This evidence was central to the Competition Tribunal adopting a condition that Walmart put in place a supplier development fund, and the Competition Appeal Court singling out Genesis as fulfilling the expert role in these kinds of proceedings in an exemplary fashion.       

When the Competition Appeal Court later decided to refer the matter of the size and structure of the supplier development fund to a group of experts, Genesis was once more involved in developing submissions, which were co-authored by Nobel laureate, Joseph Stiglitz. This process ultimately resulted in the total funds dedicated to a supplier development fund being raised from R100 million to R200 million. At the conclusion of the proceedings, the Appeal Court singled out the Genesis team for fulfilling its expert role in the proceedings in an exemplary fashion

The Walmart case not only shaped the legal view of public interest in merger control, but the contribution made by Genesis  demonstrated that economists are able to bring useful tools to bear in matters such as these. Using these tools, they are able to accurately quantify and measure the effects on public interest variables and, in doing so, to greatly improve legal decision-making on otherwise vague concepts.   

Impact of Walmart merger on Namibia

Telkom series of abuse of dominance cases

Project name:
Telkom series of abuse of dominance cases

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Communications and media

Area of Expertise:
Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

Client:
Competition Commission

Date:
2011 – 2013

Country:
South Africa


Genesis was specifically selected by the Competition Commission of South Africa to provide expert reports and testimony in the prosecution of a series of abuse of dominance cases brought against the fixed-line incumbent, Telkom. The multi-faceted complaints focused on exclusionary and exploitative practices designed to inhibit downstream competition in internet access and corporate virtual private networks, including margin squeeze, inducement and excessive pricing.

Combining our deep understanding of telecommunications markets with a meticulous evaluation of the strategy and pricing documents, Genesis was able to determine that Telkom priced its own downstream services below the cost of the necessary wholesale inputs it provided to its competitors and, in so doing, was engaged in a deliberate margin-squeeze strategy. This evidence, and the effective rebuttal of the Telkom defence, was instrumental in the Competition Tribunal finding against Telkom on margin squeeze in the first case, and ultimately imposing a fine of over R400-million.  

In the second case, Genesis used a sophisticated financial model to demonstrate that if Telkom’s own downstream services paid wholesale inputs charged to competitors, then it would be loss-making. A thorough analysis of market data also revealed that this had an exclusionary effect on competitors. Genesis also demonstrated that pricing for certain transmission products was excessive relative to the costs.

The Genesis report was material in moving Telkom to settle the second complaint. Genesis was asked to take a lead role in the settlement negotiations, which fundamentally reshaped the market by bringing about a functional separation between wholesale and retail services, cash fines of R200-million and price reductions of almost R900-million. In approving the settlement, the Competition Tribunal described it as the most sophisticated and far-reaching settlement it had ever seen. 

Unlocking competition in digital finance in Africa & Asia

Project name:
Unlocking competition in digital finance

Service:
Financial inclusion
Competition economics

Sector:
Financial services

Client:
Confidential

Date:
2015 - 2016

Country:
Bangladesh
India
Kenya
Nigeria


Genesis was commissioned to study impediments to more effective competition in mobile money markets in four markets – India, Bangladesh, Kenya and Nigeria. The explosive growth in mobile money in a number of countries has made a key contribution to providing the poor with access to financial services. At the same time, in some of these markets, the presence of dominant providers, inappropriate regulations, and other problems may prevent effective competition, to the detriment of consumers and to innovation.

The purpose of the study was to provide the client with insights into (i) potential regulatory or market-based solutions to identified problems; and (ii) how these might be promoted to improve competitive outcomes for consumers of digital financial services (“DFS”).

The team conducted the study by utilising four main tools i.e.:

  • A competition policy framework  based on economic theory
  • An extensive literature review on DFS, payment systems, competition and regulation issues in network industries, and also in multi-sided platform industries
  • Stakeholder engagements in the four countries, i.e., DFS/MFS providers, regulators, banks and mobile network operators (MNOs)
  • Internal financial sector expertise and knowledge provided by the project leader, Richard Ketley  

In addition to various country-specific recommendations, Genesis identified the following cross-cutting priorities:

  • That appropriate regulation is required for USSD pricing. Cost-based pricing of USSD is a critical enabler of competition.
  • Regulators should drive full interoperability between competing MFS platforms
  • Regulatory capacity building is required at the interface between competition law and payment systems regulation to develop the pro-competitive regulatory approaches in future.

Expert evidence on SA National Payments System

Project name:
Expert economic evidence regarding the competition risks of a structural change in the South African National Payments System

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Financial services

Area of Expertise:
Merger analysis and public interest

Client:
Association of System Operators

Date:
2014

Country:
South Africa


The South African National Payments System is the backbone of the South African economy. Genesis was asked by the Association of System Operators (ASO) to address a number of key competition issues in terms of the reconsideration of conditions imposed by the Competition Commission in two mergers in the South African National Payment System. 

The case involved the merger of Bankserv, the payment system operator, with two downstream system operators, Emid and Nomad. The merger was initially approved with conditions, but subsequently a dispute arose regarding whether the conditions were appropriate.  In particular, ASO was concerned that Bankserv’s unique position, as an effective utility provider of interbank clearing and settlement, would provide it with the ability and incentive to engage in anti-competitive behaviour in the downstream markets.  In light of their concerns ASO asked Genesis to assess the merger conditions.

 In this matter Genesis produced an expert report which highlighted potential concerns relating to the merger based on convincing theories of harm.  In this regard, the ultimate concern related to cross-subsidisation and predatory pricing – a relatively uncommon theory of harm, particularly in the case of mergers. The Genesis report also assessed the appropriateness of the conditions proposed by the Competition Commission in light of such risks and suggested enhanced remedies.

 The Genesis report was instrumental in securing a settlement between the parties in the form of conditions that were significantly enhanced and provided sufficient safeguards for the theories of harm identified in the Genesis report.  These conditions were also accepted by the Tribunal.

Competition Commission vs Netstar and others

Project name:
Competition Commission vs Netstar and others

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Manufacturing

Area of Expertise:
Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

Client:
Netstar, Tracker

Date:
2009

Country:
South Africa


In what has become a landmark case, Genesis was retained by a number of vehicle-tracking companies to provide an independent economic analysis of the allegation that a standard set for the vehicle-tracking industry and its adoption by insurers had the effect of raising barriers to new entrants. This was the first product standard case in South Africa and raised a host of complex legal and economic issues. 

On the back of extensive research into USA and EU case law, Genesis tackled the issue from three major angles. The first was an analysis of whether the standard was developed in conjunction with, and on the instruction of, the insurance firms themselves. This is because, in economic theory, customers are unlikely to agree to a standard which would harm themselves. Second, Genesis sought to understand how widely the standard was adopted by insurance companies at the time, and therefore whether new entrants could gain traction with some insurers, even if not all. Finally, Genesis spent considerable effort in building evidence as to whether any potential entrant was ready for entry during the period the standard was in place and therefore whether it had the actual effect of preventing entry. 

This analysis contributed to the eventual finding by the Competition Appeal Court that the case against the vehicle-tracking companies lacked merit. Genesis’s work also helped the court establish an important legal principle in assessing these types of cases, namely that the effect cannot be hypothetical where a specific allegation is made by a litigant. Rather, in those cases the court found there was a need to demonstrate an actual effect.

Expert testimony in alleged case of excessive pricing

Project name:
Expert advice and testimony in an alleged case of excessive pricing in the polymer production industry

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Manufacturing

Area of Expertise:
Expert testimony
Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices

Client:
Sasol Chemicals

Date:
2015

Country:
South Africa


The concept of excessive pricing and how competition authorities should treat this prohibition has been the subject of much debate worldwide. The seminal Sasol Polymers excessive-pricing case has since set precedent as to how future claims of excessive pricing will be assessed in South Africa, and is likely to also shape the approach of other competition authorities across Africa. In this matter, Genesis was commissioned to provide an in-depth economic assessment of whether Sasol’s polypropylene export prices were likely to represent a valid comparator to the domestic prices that were alleged to be excessive. 

Central to this analysis was the question as to whether an investment in an export facility could be taken as a reliable indication that export prices were a reflection of economic value (and therefore a reasonable benchmark against which excessive prices could be evaluated).  Combining our deep understanding of Sasol’s business, with a meticulous evaluation of Sasol’s investment decisions and financial position, Genesis was able to offer an assessment which showed that export prices in this matter did not necessarily represent a reasonable benchmark to evaluate excessive prices.

Neither the Tribunal nor the Competition Appeal Court disputed the independent economic analysis offered by Genesis Analytics.  The Competition Appeal Court ultimately overturned an initial finding of excessive pricing against Sasol made by the Competition Tribunal.

Consolidation of safety-shoe manufacture

Project name:
Consolidation of safety-shoe manufacture

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Manufacturing

Area of Expertise:
Merger analysis and public interest

Client:

Date:
2012

Country:
South Africa


Genesis was approached by all the major safety-shoe manufacturers in South Africa in order to assist them in assessing what the competitive effects would be of a consolidation of the industry and whether this would pass muster under the Competition Act. This required not only a detailed assessment of what role imports played in safety-shoe sales of different standards and price, but also to model the potential efficiency effects of such a consolidation and reorganisation of the production plants.

Genesis was able to demonstrate through a quantitative analysis that while the majority of safety-shoe imports were primarily of a lower standard and cheaper price, these were effectively constraining safety shoes of a higher standard and price. This indicated that a single market was likely across differing qualities and that imports placed a significant constraint on domestic producers.

In addition, with the assistance of the manufacturers, Genesis built a model of the efficiencies that would likely arise through the reorganisation of production facilities and the net effect this was likely to have on costs of production. On this basis Genesis was also able to determine the potential public interest benefits from stemming the loss of employment and reductions in output for the domestic industry.

The Competition Commission’s own investigation of the merger also reached the conclusion that the merger would not lessen competition and, in contrast, was likely to help preserve jobs and output in South Africa. As a result, the merger was unconditionally approved by the competition authorities.

HPCSA vs Buchanan

Project name:
HPCSA vs Buchanan

Service:
Competition economics

Sector:
Health

Area of Expertise:
Expert testimony

Client:
HPCSA

Date:
2014

Country:
South Africa


Whether corporate ownership of healthcare providers can improve efficiency and lower prices is a hotly contested topic in the healthcare sector. In this case an individual who operated a large franchise of optometrists put this topic on trial. The person lodged a competition law complaint that the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) was involved in a restrictive horizontal practice by not permitting corporate ownership. Genesis was retained by the HPCSA to provide an expert economic view of whether this was the case.

While there were legal questions as to whether the practice could fall within the ambit of a restrictive trade practice, Genesis focused on the core economic question of whether the complainant was able to demonstrate that competition was indeed lessened by the exclusion of corporate ownership. Genesis first sought to determine, from the international applied economic literature and regulatory reviews, what the specific benefits were alleged to follow corporate ownership. On that basis, Genesis was able to determine that most of these alleged benefits could already be realised through permitting franchise arrangements in optometry, and that the only potential incremental benefit was raising capital. However, the evidence collected by Genesis demonstrated that this was not a barrier to entry in optometry.

The Competition Tribunal concurred with the Genesis opinion and cited the Genesis findings as its primary reasons for dismissing the complaint. This included findings that there was no evidence the optometry market was uncompetitive.

Meet the Team

BALANCING ACT OF ECONOMICS IN REGULATING FEES

What has led to the 35% drop in departure fees that passengers leaving South African airports will pay from 1 April 2017? Economics can provide guidance on how appropriate  prices are determined and should evolve in a regulated setting. Download newsletter and Previous newsletters

Areas of Service Expertise

  • Abuse of dominance and prohibited practices
  • Merger analysis and public interest
  • Expert testimony
  • Compliance advice

Related Sectors

Projects

Project

Genesis probes restrictive warranties on car parts

Genesis was asked by a player in the automotive industry to conduct an independent economic assessment of the impact of prescriptive warranty provisions used by original equipment motor vehicle manufacturers (OEMs) on South African consumers.  

View Project
Project

Genesis advises Media24 in seminal predatory pricing case

Genesis was retained by Media24, a large newspaper and magazine publisher, to defend predatory pricing allegations made against the group by the Competition Commission in what has proven to be South Africa’s seminal  predation case. 

View Project

Search

Search for more Genesis projects

Leading the team

James Hodge

Director and Managing Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)

James Hodge
Director and Managing Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)
Read More

Fatima Maria Fiandeiro

Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)

Fatima Maria Fiandeiro
Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)
Read More

Stephan Malherbe

Chair and Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)

Stephan Malherbe
Chair and Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)
Read More

Anthony Felet

Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)

Anthony Felet
Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)
Read More

Paul Anderson

Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)

Paul Anderson
Partner (Competition and Regulatory Economics)
Read More